Revision

I view my process of revision as very effective. Without revising my papers I would still have the errors that I originally made in my rough drafts. Often times my original drafts have spelling, grammar, and comma mistakes. In my revision I read over my draft multiple times looking for any errors that I have made. I believe that no paper is perfect after the first draft; therefor without the revision process writing would not be as professional as it is today. I believe that revision is making a difference in my writings. Many times I revise my papers myself and then have a peer check over my paper. The revision process is clear to me and I am not having many difficulties revising. The one area in my papers that I believe I can improve on is my thesis statement. The thesis statement should be a strong statement stating what the entire paper is about. When revising I need to strengthen my thesis and make it powerful and enticing to the reader. All of my experiences with revision have been successful. I prefer my papers to be read by multiple peers to get multiple suggestions on how to make my paper more professional. I believe that the more peer editors who read my paper the better, the peers who read and polish up my paper help my in composing my final draft. Although revision is not always the most enjoyable process in creating a successful paper, but it is needed to cut out the errors made in the rough drafts.